Inteligência avaliativa em rede: construindo consenso em Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde

Tazio Vanni; Airton Tetelbom Stein; Kathiaja Miranda Souza; Marina Gonçalves de Freitas; Isadora Patterson; Eduardo Coura Assis; Marcia Luz da Motta; Luciana Leão; Rodrigo Costa Oliveira; Flávia Tavares Silva Elias

doi:10.29397/reciis.v9i4.1026

Assessment intelligence network: consensus building in Health Technology Assessment

Authors

Tazio Vanni Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Airton Tetelbom Stein Grupo Hospitalar Conceição, Coordenador do Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologia em Saúde. Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brasil.
Kathiaja Miranda Souza Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Marina Gonçalves de Freitas Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Isadora Patterson Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Eduardo Coura Assis Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Marcia Luz da Motta Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Luciana Leão Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Rodrigo Costa Oliveira Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Flávia Tavares Silva Elias Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Programa de evidências em políticas e tecnologias de saúde. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v9i4.1026

Keywords:

Public Health, Biomedical Technology, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Intelligence, Guidelines as Topic, Methods, Standards

Abstract

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary field of study which seeks to analyze health technologies development, diffusion and use and their clinical, social, economic and ethical implications. The defining process of HTA methodological guidelines requires consensus building among a broad range of experts and decision makers in the elaboration of a scientific robust document. In Brazil, since the creation of the Brazilian Network for Health Technology Assessment (REBRATS) in 2008, the elaboration of HTA guidelines has been performed through a collaborative process between network members. This process has contributed not only to the HTA methodological standardization, but also to structure an assessment intelligence network in Brazil. This article aims to discuss the structure and dynamics of this evaluative intelligence and how it has improved over time.

Author Biographies

Tazio Vanni, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Facebook

Twitter

Airton Tetelbom Stein, Grupo Hospitalar Conceição, Coordenador do Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologia em Saúde. Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brasil.

Facebook

Twitter

Research Gate

Kathiaja Miranda Souza, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Facebook

Marina Gonçalves de Freitas, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Facebook

Isadora Patterson, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Facebook

Luciana Leão, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Facebook

Rodrigo Costa Oliveira, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Facebook

Research Gate

Flávia Tavares Silva Elias, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Programa de evidências em políticas e tecnologias de saúde. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Downloads

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Published

2015-12-18

How to Cite

Vanni, T., Stein, A. T., Souza, K. M., de Freitas, M. G., Patterson, I., Assis, E. C., … Elias, F. T. S. (2015). Assessment intelligence network: consensus building in Health Technology Assessment. Revista Eletrônica De Comunicação, Informação & Inovação Em Saúde, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v9i4.1026

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 4 (2015)

Section

Original articles

License

Author’s rights: The author retains unrestricted rights over his work.

Rights to reuse: Reciis adopts the Creative Commons License, CC BY-NC non-commercial attribution according to the Policy on Open Access to Knowledge by Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. With this license, access, download, copy, print, share, reuse, and distribution of articles is allowed, provided that it is for non-commercial use and with source citation, granting proper authorship credits and reference to Reciis. In such cases, no permission is required from the authors or editors.

Rights of authors’s deposit / self-archiving: The authors are encouraged to deposit the published version, along with the link of their article in Reciis, in institutional repositories.

Dossier Care-in-interaction: practices, knowledge, and reflexivity in health (v. 18, n. 2) Apr./Jun. 2024.

October 27, 2023

A concept inseparable from communication, interaction is a constitutive part of the communicative act. While broad and guided by different approaches, human communication interactional studies have the common analytical challenge of observing the joint construction of utterances and their actional values in the microecological environment in which they occur, which implies looking emically, that is, starting from within, and considering the reflective processes of the people participating in that human communication interaction (Rodrigues, 2021).

This dossier, whose title mobilizes the care-in-interaction concept, addresses health care from an interactionist perspective (Ostermann; Meneghel, 2012), with particular interest in research with a multimodal focus to articulate, in a finely detailed descriptive work, speech and body studies (Mondada, 2018).

The expression care-in-interaction is generated by a common matrix in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis (EMCA) (Loder; Jung, 2008), an investigative current originating from North American sociology, derived from Harold Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodology, which has been embraced globally in multiple disciplinary fields (Watson; Gastaldo, 2015), and which has brought speech-and-the-body-in-interaction as an object of study in the last ten years.

Analyses are data driven and can mobilize and articulate other theoretical currents, which focus on multiple objects and events, namely, polyphony and Bakhtinian dialogism, the Austinian analysis of speech acts, the Goffmanian face work and politeness, contextualization prosodic cues, and justifications and the theory of argumentation in language.

From the perspective of ethnomethodological and conversation analysis, care-in-interaction studies open up a range of investigations into interactions in different environments using several resources. As Harvey Sacks points out in his classical study of telephone conversations recorded by a suicide prevention center in the United States of America and, therefore, mediated by a technological device for distance communication, research whose collected material does not include all multimodal resources available in face-to-face interactions bring about challenges that reinforce the great analytical potential of looking inward, considering the natural and artificial devices of mediation to the world.

Two initial questions instigated this dossier: a) How is interactivity being operated in different environments and settings, especially regarding health topics? b) In what ways can microanalytical approaches to studies on interactions contribute to understanding social processes?

We encourage contributions from authors from different social, human, and health sciences fields – with particular emphasis on communication studies, language, anthropology, social work, and sociology – for thematic sub-axes such as:

Epistemic asymmetries, situated cognition, intercomprehension, and emotions-in-interaction;
Microanalytical studies of conversational frameworks of social and health intervention;
Telepresence interactions, mediated by multimodal computers (microphone, speaker, webcam, and screen);
Interactional frameworks of joint research and self-confrontation practices in the training of health and social professionals;
Participation of citizens in devices for joint analysis of service and care practices (citizen science);
Atypical interactions in their interdisciplinary dimensions of social studies of disability.

Guest editors: Marcia Rodrigues Lisboa (Oswaldo Cruz Foundation – Laboratory of Phenomenology, Ethnomethodology and Conversational Analysis of Social Clusivity – Lab-FEACC_CLISSIS) and Michel Binet (Universidade Lusíada – Laboratory of Phenomenology, Ethnomethodology and Conversational Analysis of Social Clusivity – Lab-FEACC_CLISSIS)

Submission deadline: until February 20, 2024.

Publication estimate: v. 18, no. 2, April/June 2024.

When submitting the work, please use the category Dossier Care-in-interaction: practices, knowledge, and reflexivity in health.

References

LODER, Letícia Ludwig; JUNG, Neiva Maria (ed). Fala-em-interação social: introdução à análise da conversa etnometodológica. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2008.

MONDADA, Lorenza. Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, United States, v. 51, n. 1, p. 85-106, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878, Accessed: Oct. 25, 2023.

OSTERMANN, Ana Cristina; MENEGHEL, Stela Nazareth (orgs). Humanização Gênero Poder: contribuições dos estudos de fala-em-interação para a atenção à saúde. Campinas: Mercado de Letras; Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2012.

RODRIGUES, Adriano Duarte. A natureza da atividade comunicativa. Lisboa: Lisbon Press, 2021.

WATSON, Rod; GASTALDO, Édison. Etnometodologia e análise da conversa. Petrópolis: Vozes: PUC-Rio, 2015.

Prorrogação - Dossiê O Povo da rua: saúde, políticas públicas e comunicação

May 19, 2023

Agora você tem até o dia 31 de maio para submeter seu artigo original para o dossiê O Povo da rua: saúde, políticas públicas e comunicação

Esse dossiê procura refletir sobre as práticas e políticas públicas envolvendo, particularmente, a saúde e a rua como lugar de vínculos comunicacionais.

Mais informações / More information/ Mas informaciones/ Plus d'information:
www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br

Assessment intelligence network: consensus building in Health Technology Assessment

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

Author Biographies

Tazio Vanni, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Airton Tetelbom Stein, Grupo Hospitalar Conceição, Coordenador do Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologia em Saúde. Rio Grande do Sul, RS, Brasil.

Kathiaja Miranda Souza, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Marina Gonçalves de Freitas, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Isadora Patterson, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Luciana Leão, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Rodrigo Costa Oliveira, Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Flávia Tavares Silva Elias, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Programa de evidências em políticas e tecnologias de saúde. Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Language

Qualis

Social media

Announcements

Dossier Care-in-interaction: practices, knowledge, and reflexivity in health (v. 18, n. 2) Apr./Jun. 2024.

Prorrogação - Dossiê O Povo da rua: saúde, políticas públicas e comunicação

Keywords

Current Issue

Make a Submission

Indexadores e avaliadores

Information