GeoInfo - Infraestrutura de Dados Espaciais Abertos para a Pesquisa Agropecuária

Debora Pignatari Drucker; Daniela Maciel Pinto; Elaine Cristina Cardoso Fidalgo; Davi Oliveira Custódio; Daniel de Castro Victoria; Bibiana Teixeira Almeida; Margareth Simões; Claudia Regina De Laia Machado; Vera Viana dos Santos Brandão; Ricardo de Oliveira Dart; Mário Luiz Diamante Aglio; Francisca Rasche; Maria Regina Capdeville Laforet; Giovana Maranhão Bettiol; Sandro Eduardo Marschhausen Pereira; Ziany Neiva Brandão; Marilice Cordeiro Garrastazu; José Maria Filippini Alba; Fábia Amorim da Costa; Renato Cristiano Torres; Márcia Helena Galina Dompieri; Sandra Maria Neiva Sampaio; Espedito Cezário Martins; Ivo Pierozzi Junior; Gustavo Bayma-Silva; Graziella Galinari; Flávia Bussaglia Fiorini; Celina Maki Takemura; Sergio Aparecido Braga Da Cruz; Wilson Anderson Holler; Leandro Henrique De Oliveira

doi:10.29397/reciis.v11i0.1356

GeoInfo - Open Spatial Data Infrastructure for Agricultural Research

Authors

Debora Pignatari Drucker Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4177-1322
Daniela Maciel Pinto Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite, Campinas, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0539-622X
Elaine Cristina Cardoso Fidalgo Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Davi Oliveira Custódio Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite, Campinas, Brasil.
Daniel de Castro Victoria Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2281-5644
Bibiana Teixeira Almeida Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite, Campinas, Brasil.
Margareth Simões Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5533-584X
Claudia Regina De Laia Machado Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Vera Viana dos Santos Brandão Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite, Campinas, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7709-3722
Ricardo de Oliveira Dart Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Mário Luiz Diamante Aglio Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Francisca Rasche Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, Brasil.
Maria Regina Capdeville Laforet Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Giovana Maranhão Bettiol Embrapa Cerrados, Brasília, Brasil.
Sandro Eduardo Marschhausen Pereira Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Jaguariúna, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8250-789X
Ziany Neiva Brandão Embrapa Algodão, Campina Grande, Brasil.
Marilice Cordeiro Garrastazu Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, Brasil.
José Maria Filippini Alba Embrapa Clima Temperado, Pelotas, Brasil.
Fábia Amorim da Costa Embrapa Clima Temperado, Pelotas, Brasil.
Renato Cristiano Torres Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, Sinop, Brasil.
Márcia Helena Galina Dompieri Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros, Aracaju, Brasil.
Sandra Maria Neiva Sampaio Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Belém, Brasil.
Espedito Cezário Martins Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos, Sobral, Brasil.
Ivo Pierozzi Junior Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, Brasil.
Gustavo Bayma-Silva Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Jaguariúna, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5312-6609
Graziella Galinari Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite, Campinas, Brasil.
Flávia Bussaglia Fiorini Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite, Campinas, Brasil.
Celina Maki Takemura Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite, Campinas, Brasil.
Sergio Aparecido Braga Da Cruz Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, Brasil.
Wilson Anderson Holler Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, Brasil.
Leandro Henrique De Oliveira Embrapa, Departamento de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Brasília, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v11i0.1356

Keywords:

Geoinformation, Interoperability, Agricultural Science, Geoservices, Scientific Data, Metadata, Geodata

Abstract

Geoinformation is essential to plan and monitor agricultural activities, justifying efforts to gather and standardize it according to governmental guidelines and to make it available to decision makers and general public. This work aims on presenting the experience of Embrapa on building its Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI). This SDI, called GeoInfo, is an initiative to organize, preserve, document and offer geodata produced by the company, in order to increase the application of this information in the production and diffusion of knowledge and innovation. GeoInfo implements the guidelines of the Brazilian National Spatial Data Infrastructure and enables scientific geodata interoperability, encompassing semantics. GeoInfo SDI promotes redundancy of efforts avoidance in obtaining and producing geodata. This initiative enables the integration of geospatial information produced at Embrapa with many other public information sources available worldwide.

Author Biography

Ivo Pierozzi Junior, Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, Brasil.

Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, Brasil.

Downloads

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Published

2017-11-30

How to Cite

Drucker, D. P., Pinto, D. M., Fidalgo, E. C. C., Custódio, D. O., Victoria, D. de C., Almeida, B. T., … De Oliveira, L. H. (2017). GeoInfo - Open Spatial Data Infrastructure for Agricultural Research. Revista Eletrônica De Comunicação, Informação & Inovação Em Saúde, 11. https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v11i0.1356

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 11 (2017): Suplemento

Section

Pecha Kucha

License

Author’s rights: The author retains unrestricted rights over his work.

Rights to reuse: Reciis adopts the Creative Commons License, CC BY-NC non-commercial attribution according to the Policy on Open Access to Knowledge by Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. With this license, access, download, copy, print, share, reuse, and distribution of articles is allowed, provided that it is for non-commercial use and with source citation, granting proper authorship credits and reference to Reciis. In such cases, no permission is required from the authors or editors.

Rights of authors’s deposit / self-archiving: The authors are encouraged to deposit the published version, along with the link of their article in Reciis, in institutional repositories.

Dossier Care-in-interaction: practices, knowledge, and reflexivity in health (v. 18, n. 2) Apr./Jun. 2024.

October 27, 2023

A concept inseparable from communication, interaction is a constitutive part of the communicative act. While broad and guided by different approaches, human communication interactional studies have the common analytical challenge of observing the joint construction of utterances and their actional values in the microecological environment in which they occur, which implies looking emically, that is, starting from within, and considering the reflective processes of the people participating in that human communication interaction (Rodrigues, 2021).

This dossier, whose title mobilizes the care-in-interaction concept, addresses health care from an interactionist perspective (Ostermann; Meneghel, 2012), with particular interest in research with a multimodal focus to articulate, in a finely detailed descriptive work, speech and body studies (Mondada, 2018).

The expression care-in-interaction is generated by a common matrix in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis (EMCA) (Loder; Jung, 2008), an investigative current originating from North American sociology, derived from Harold Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodology, which has been embraced globally in multiple disciplinary fields (Watson; Gastaldo, 2015), and which has brought speech-and-the-body-in-interaction as an object of study in the last ten years.

Analyses are data driven and can mobilize and articulate other theoretical currents, which focus on multiple objects and events, namely, polyphony and Bakhtinian dialogism, the Austinian analysis of speech acts, the Goffmanian face work and politeness, contextualization prosodic cues, and justifications and the theory of argumentation in language.

From the perspective of ethnomethodological and conversation analysis, care-in-interaction studies open up a range of investigations into interactions in different environments using several resources. As Harvey Sacks points out in his classical study of telephone conversations recorded by a suicide prevention center in the United States of America and, therefore, mediated by a technological device for distance communication, research whose collected material does not include all multimodal resources available in face-to-face interactions bring about challenges that reinforce the great analytical potential of looking inward, considering the natural and artificial devices of mediation to the world.

Two initial questions instigated this dossier: a) How is interactivity being operated in different environments and settings, especially regarding health topics? b) In what ways can microanalytical approaches to studies on interactions contribute to understanding social processes?

We encourage contributions from authors from different social, human, and health sciences fields – with particular emphasis on communication studies, language, anthropology, social work, and sociology – for thematic sub-axes such as:

Epistemic asymmetries, situated cognition, intercomprehension, and emotions-in-interaction;
Microanalytical studies of conversational frameworks of social and health intervention;
Telepresence interactions, mediated by multimodal computers (microphone, speaker, webcam, and screen);
Interactional frameworks of joint research and self-confrontation practices in the training of health and social professionals;
Participation of citizens in devices for joint analysis of service and care practices (citizen science);
Atypical interactions in their interdisciplinary dimensions of social studies of disability.

Guest editors: Marcia Rodrigues Lisboa (Oswaldo Cruz Foundation – Laboratory of Phenomenology, Ethnomethodology and Conversational Analysis of Social Clusivity – Lab-FEACC_CLISSIS) and Michel Binet (Universidade Lusíada – Laboratory of Phenomenology, Ethnomethodology and Conversational Analysis of Social Clusivity – Lab-FEACC_CLISSIS)

Submission deadline: until February 20, 2024.

Publication estimate: v. 18, no. 2, April/June 2024.

When submitting the work, please use the category Dossier Care-in-interaction: practices, knowledge, and reflexivity in health.

References

LODER, Letícia Ludwig; JUNG, Neiva Maria (ed). Fala-em-interação social: introdução à análise da conversa etnometodológica. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2008.

MONDADA, Lorenza. Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, United States, v. 51, n. 1, p. 85-106, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878, Accessed: Oct. 25, 2023.

OSTERMANN, Ana Cristina; MENEGHEL, Stela Nazareth (orgs). Humanização Gênero Poder: contribuições dos estudos de fala-em-interação para a atenção à saúde. Campinas: Mercado de Letras; Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2012.

RODRIGUES, Adriano Duarte. A natureza da atividade comunicativa. Lisboa: Lisbon Press, 2021.

WATSON, Rod; GASTALDO, Édison. Etnometodologia e análise da conversa. Petrópolis: Vozes: PUC-Rio, 2015.

Prorrogação - Dossiê O Povo da rua: saúde, políticas públicas e comunicação

May 19, 2023

Agora você tem até o dia 31 de maio para submeter seu artigo original para o dossiê O Povo da rua: saúde, políticas públicas e comunicação

Esse dossiê procura refletir sobre as práticas e políticas públicas envolvendo, particularmente, a saúde e a rua como lugar de vínculos comunicacionais.

Mais informações / More information/ Mas informaciones/ Plus d'information:
www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br

GeoInfo - Open Spatial Data Infrastructure for Agricultural Research

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

Author Biography

Ivo Pierozzi Junior, Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, Brasil.

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Language

Qualis

Social media

Announcements

Dossier Care-in-interaction: practices, knowledge, and reflexivity in health (v. 18, n. 2) Apr./Jun. 2024.

Prorrogação - Dossiê O Povo da rua: saúde, políticas públicas e comunicação

Keywords

Current Issue

Make a Submission

Indexadores e avaliadores

Information