Innovation, possibilities and limitations in the use of an eye tracker in science communication research: a study on the importance of the source of information in health news
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v15i4.2294Keywords:
Science communication, Eye tracker, Fake news, Misinformation and health, Journalism.Abstract
Our study, the result of an international partnership, sought to assess the importance given by 23 readers to the name of the publication source for four different texts on health topics, using an innovative methodology in the academic study field of scientific communication – an eye tracker. With an eye tracker, it is possible to map at every moment the reader’s eyes and points of fixation of the eye on the text, indicating the reader’s attention. Although the source of publication is considered an important criterion for the credibility of the information, our results, from the analysis of 35,394 measurements of fixations measured by the eye tracker, indicate the little importance given to the name of the publication source, even though the text presents fake news characteristics.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Author’s rights: The author retains unrestricted rights over his work.
Rights to reuse: Reciis adopts the Creative Commons License, CC BY-NC non-commercial attribution according to the Policy on Open Access to Knowledge by Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. With this license, access, download, copy, print, share, reuse, and distribution of articles is allowed, provided that it is for non-commercial use and with source citation, granting proper authorship credits and reference to Reciis. In such cases, no permission is required from the authors or editors.
Rights of authors’s deposit / self-archiving: The authors are encouraged to deposit the published version, along with the link of their article in Reciis, in institutional repositories.