Urgency of knowledge generation during the covid-19 pandemic: a retrospective on health publication integrity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v16i3.3303Keywords:
Research integrity, Ethics in research, Retraction, Publication, Covid-19Abstract
During the covid-19 pandemic, a significant increase in the number of publications (articles and preprints) was observed, which led to the rapid sharing of information and encouraged the discussion about scientific integrity in the generation of knowledge during health emergencies. In this sense, the present work aims to analyze research integrity in health publications during the covid-19 pandemic. For this goal, we conducted documentary research on websites of organizations that promote the culture of research integrity. We verified how the urgency of generating knowledge positively accelerated the debate on ethics and integrity in research and open science. On the other hand, this context exposed critical points, such as questionable research practices, and/or research fraud. Educational actions in research institutions aimed at implementing and maintaining a culture of integrity can significantly contribute to positive changes in the research system.
References
ABRITIS, Alison; MARCUS, Adam; ORANSKY, Ivan. An “alarming” and “exceptionally high” rate of covid-19 retractions?. Accountability in Research, Londres, v. 28, n. 1, p. 58-59, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1793675. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989621.2020.1793675. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2022.
ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIÊNCIAS (ABC). Rigor e integridade na condução da pesquisa científica:guia de recomendações de práticas responsáveis. [Rio de Janeiro]: ABC, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.abc.org.br/IMG/pdf/doc-4559.pdf. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2022.
ANDERSON, Caleb; NUGENT, Kenneth; PETERSON, Christopher. Academic journal retractions and the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, Thousand Oaks, v.12, jan.-dez. 2021, p. 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21501327211015592. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21501327211015592. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
ARMOND, Anna Catharina Vieira; KAKUK, Péter. Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil. Accountability in Research, Londres, p. 1-17, set. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1979969. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989621.2021.1979969. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
BARBOUR, Virginia et al. Amending published articles: time to rethink retractions and corrections? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000 Research, Londres, v. 6, p. 1960, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13060.1. Disponível em: https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1960. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
BENEDICTUS, Rinze; MIEDEMA, Frank; FERGUSON, Mark W.J. Fewer numbers, better science. Nature, Londres, v. 538, p. 453-455, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/538453a. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/538453a. Acesso em: 03 abr. 2022.
BIK, Elisabeth. Elisabeth Bik: no rastro das fraudes científicas. Entrevista cedida a Rodrigo de Oliveira Andrade. Revista Pesquisa Fapesp, São Paulo, n. 310, p. 50-53, dez. 2021. Entrevista. Disponível em: https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/elisabeth-bik-no-rastro-das-fraudes-cientificas/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
BRAINARD, Jeffrey. Scientists are drowning in covid-19 papers: can new tools keep them afloat?. ScienceInsider, Londres, 13 maio 2020. Scientific Community. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1126/science.abc7839. Disponível em: https://www.science.org/content/article/scientists-are-drowning-covid-19-papers-cannew-tools-keep-them-afloat. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2022.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n. 188 de 03 de fevereiro de 2020. Declara Emergência em Saúde Pública de importância Nacional (ESPIN) em decorrência da Infecção Humana pelo novo Coronavírus (2019-nCoV). Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, ed. 24-A, p. 1, 04 fev. 2020. Seção 1 – Extra. Disponível em: https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/portaria-n-188-de-3-de-fevereiro-de-2020-241408388. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2022.
CALLAWAY, Ewen et al. Covid and 2020: an extraordinary year for science. Nature, Londres, v. 588, n. 7839, p. 550-552, 2020. DOI: www.doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03437-4. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/immersive/d41586-020-03437-4/index.html. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
CAMPOS-VARELA, Isabel; RUANO-RAVIÑA, Alberto. Misconduct as the main cause for retraction: a descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors. Gaceta Sanitaria, Madrid, v. 33, n. 4, p. 356-360, jul.-ago. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911118300724?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
COBB, Matthew. The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s. PLoS Biology, São Francisco, v. 15, n. 11, p. e2003995, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003995. Disponível em: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2003995. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO (CNPq), Comissão de Integridade na Atividade Científica. Diretrizes. Brasília, DF: CNPq, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/cnpq/pt-br/composicao/comissao-de-integridade. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2022.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE SAÚDE (CNS). Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa. Brasília, DF: CONEP, 2022. Disponível em: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/comissoes-cns/conep/. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2022.
COORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DE PESSOAL DE NÍVEL SUPERIOR (CAPES). Ficha de Avaliação. Brasília, DF: CAPES, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br/centrais-deconteudo/10062019-fichaavaliacao-pdf. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
COPE COUNCIL. COPE discussion document: preprints. Eastleigh: COPE, 2018. Disponível em: https://publicationethics.org/files/u7140/COPE_Preprints_Mar18.pdf. Acesso em: 26 de março de 2022.
COPE COUNCIL. Guidelines: retraction guidelines. 2. ed. Eastleigh: COPE, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.4. Disponível em: https://publicationethics.org/files/cope-retraction-guidelines-v2.pdf. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
COPE COUNCIL. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Eastleigh: COPE, 2009. Disponível em: https://publicationethics.org/files/u661/Retractions_COPE_gline_final_3_Sept_09__2_.pdf. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
CROSS, Di; THOMSON, Simon; SINCLAIR, Alexandra. Research in Brazil: a report for CAPES by Clarivate Analytics. [Londres]: Clarivate Analytics, 2017 Disponível em: https://observatoriodoconhecimento.org.br/research-in-brazil-a-report-for-capes-by-clarivate-analytics/. Acesso em: 02 abr. 2022.
DECLARAÇÃO de Singapura sobre integridade em pesquisa. Dados, v. 53, n. 3, 2010: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582010000300008. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/dados/a/XNLzDn8zTKmxCxVWVSrcmFh/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
DIMENSIONS. Covid-19 report:publications, clinical trials, funding. [S. l.]: Digital Science & Research Solutions, 2020. Disponível em: https://reports.dimensions.ai/covid-19/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
DING, Yimin. In China, publish or perish is becoming the new reality. Science, Londres, v. 29, n. 5508, p. 1477-1479, 23 fev. 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5508.1477. Disponível em: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.291.5508.1477. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
DINIS-OLIVEIRA, Ricardo Jorge. Covid-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science”. Forensic Sciences Research, Abingdon, v. 5, n. 2, p. 174-187, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2020.1767754. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20961790.2020.1767754. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
DIRETRIZES do CSE [Council of Science Editors/Comitê de Política Editorial] para promover integridade em publicações de periódicos científicos. São Paulo: ABEC Brasil, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.abecbrasil.org.br/arquivos/whitepaper_CSE.pdf. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2022.
ELSE, Holly. How a torrent of covid science changed research publishing – in seven charts. Nature, v. 588, n. 7839, p. 553, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03564-y. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03564-y. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
ENCONTROS BRASILEIROS DE INTEGRIDADE EM PESQUISA, CIÊNCIA E ÉTICA NA PUBLICAÇÃO (BRISPE), 1., 2010, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Alegre, São Paulo. Site do Evento. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.ibrispe.coppe.ufrj.br/port.php. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2022.
ENCONTROS BRASILEIROS DE INTEGRIDADE EM PESQUISA, CIÊNCIA E ÉTICA NA PUBLICAÇÃO (BRISPE), 6., 2021, Rio de Janeiro. Site do Evento. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.vibrispe2020.com/. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2022.
EUROPEAN AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES CLINICAL TRIALS PARTNERSHIP (EDCTP). Mobilisation of research funds in case of Public Health Emergencies. Haia: EDCTP, 2018. Disponível em: http://www.edctp.org/call/mobilisation-of-research-funds-in-case-of-public-health-emergencies/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
FRAMPTON, Geoff; WOODS, Lois; SCOTT, David Alexander. Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: a cross-sectional study on covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice. PLoS One, São Francisco, v. 6, n. 10, p. e0258935, 27 out. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258935. Disponível em: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/pt/covidwho-1496518. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO (FAPESP). Código de boas práticas científicas. São Paulo: Fapesp, 2014. Disponível em: https://fapesp.br/boaspraticas/2014/FAPESP-Codigo_de_Boas_Praticas_Cientificas.pdf. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2022.
GIL, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1995. HAGBERG, James M. The unfortunately long life of some retracted biomedical research publications. Journal of Applied Physiology, Bethesda, v. 128, n. 5, p. 1381-1391, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00003.2020. Disponível em: https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/japplphysiol.00003.2020. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
HARLE, Jon; WARNE, Verity. Open Access:challenges and opportunities for Low- and Middle-Income Countries and the potential impact of UK policy. Londres: Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, 2020. Disponível em: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f85aa45e90e0732a2448113/20-10-05_DFID_OA_in_LMICs_-_final_report.pdf. Acesso em: 29 mar. 2022.
HICKS, Diana et al. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, Londres, v. 520, n. 7548, p. 429-431, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/520429a. Acesso em: 25 jul. 2022.
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS (ICMJE). Scientific misconduct, expressions of concern, and retraction. [S. l.]: ICMJE, c2022. Publishing & Editorial Issues. Disponível em: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/scientific-misconduct-expressions-of-concern-and-retraction.html. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
INVESTING in and building longer-term health emergency preparedness during the covid-19 pandemic: interim guidance for WHO Member States. Genebra: WHO, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/investing-in-and-building-longer-term-health-emergency-preparedness-during-the-covid-19-pandemic. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
IOANNIDIS, John P.A.; KLAVANS, Richard; BOYACK, Kevin W. Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days. Nature, v. 561, n. 7722, p. 167-169, 12 set. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06185-8. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
JEE, Youngmee. WHO International Health Regulations Emergency Committee for the covid-19 outbreak. Epidemiology and Health, Seul, v. 42, p. e2020013, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2020013. Disponível em: https://www.e-epih.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.4178/epih.e2020013. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2022.
KISZEWSKI, Anthony E. et al. NIH funding for vaccine readiness before the covid-19 pandemic. Vaccine, Amsterdã, v. 39, n. 17, p. 2458-2466, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.vaccine.2021.03.022. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X21002905?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
KLEINERT, Sabine; HORTON, Richard. Preprints with The Lancet are here to stay. The Lancet, Londres, v. 396, n.10254, p. 805, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31950-4. Disponível em: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31950-4/fulltext. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
LI, Tang; SHAPIRA, Phillip; YOUTIE, Jan. Is there a clubbing effect underlying Chinese research citation increases? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 9, p. 1923-1932, 05 mar. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23302. Disponível em: https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23302. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
LU, Roujian et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. The Lancet, Londres, v. 395, n. 10224, p. 565-574, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. Disponível em: https://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140-6736(20)30251-8/fulltext. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
MALLAPATY, Smriti. China bans cash rewards for publishing papers. Nature, Londres, v. 579, n. 7797, p. 18, 28 fev. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00574-8. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00574-8. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2022.
MANDKE, Kanad. Publish or perish: how is this still a thing? Behavioural & Social Sciences at Nature, Londres, 10 out. 2019. Disponível em: https://socialsciences.nature.com/posts/52940-is-it-publish-or-perish-for-phd-students. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2022.
MARQUES, Fabrício. Do compromisso à ação: especialistas discutem caminhos para promover de modo contínuo e efetivo uma cultura de honestidade no ambiente de pesquisa. Revista Pesquisa Fapesp, São Paulo, n. 223, p. 36-41, set. 2014. Integridade científica. Disponível em: https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/compromisso-acao/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
MARQUES, Fabrício. Integridade no ambiente da ciência aberta: BRISPE deste ano, que começa na quinta-feira, vai discutir novos desafios impostos por uma cultura de pesquisa em transformação. Revista Pesquisa Fapesp, São Paulo, 26 out. 2021. Boas práticas. Disponível em: https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/integridade-no-ambiente-da-ciencia-aberta/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
MARQUES, Fabrício. Por um novo sistema de recompensas: Conferência Mundial em Hong Kong propõe mudanças em processos de avaliação para promover a integridade científica. Revista Pesquisa Fapesp, São Paulo, n. 281, p. 8-10, jul. 2019. Boas práticas. Disponível em:https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/por-um-novo-sistema-de-recompensas/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
MEHRA, Mandeep R. et al. Retraction: Cardiovascular disease, drug therapy, and mortality in covid-19. The New England Journal of Medicine, Waltham, v. 382, p. 2582, 25 jun. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc2021225. Disponível em: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmc2021225. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
MEHRA, Mandeep R.; RUSCHITZKA, Frank; PATEL, Amit N. Retraction-Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of covid-19: a multinational registry analysis. The Lancet, Londres, v. 395, n. 10240, p. 1820, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31324-6. Disponível em: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS01406736(20)31324-6/fulltext. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
MOHER, David et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity.PLoS Biolology, São Francisco, v. 18, n. 7, p. e3000737, 16 jul. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737. Disponível em: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737. Acesso em: 25 jul. 2022.
MOHER, David et al. Princípios de Hong Kong para a avaliação de pesquisadores: promovendo a integridade em pesquisa. Tradução e adaptação para a língua portuguesa: Sonia Vasconcelos, Carmen Penido, Sigmar de Mello Rode. Abec Brasil, Botucatu, v. 1, p. 1-20, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21452/abec.2021.abec.001. Disponível em: https://www.abecbrasil.org.br/arquivos/HKPS.pdf. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
MORADI, Sharif. Publication should not be a prerequisite to obtaining a PhD. Nature Human Behaviour, v. 3, n. 10, p. 1025, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0690-7. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-019-0690-7. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2022.
NEGRI, Fernanda De. Políticas públicas para ciência e tecnologia no Brasil: cenário e evolução recente. Brasília, DF: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea), 2021. Nota Técnica. Disponível em:https://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/pubpreliminar/210825_publicacao_preliminar_nt_politicas_publicas_para_ciencia_e_tecnoogia.pdf. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2022.
NOBES, Andy; HARRIS, Siân. Open Access in low- and middle-income countries: attitudes and experiences of researchers. Emerald Open Research, [s. l.], v. 1, n. 17, p. 1-24, nov. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13325.1. Disponível em: https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/1-17/v1. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2022.
NOTICE of duplication publication: Emotional burden associated with covid-19: trust and communication in cancer care. Cancer Investigation, Oxford, v. 39, n. 4, p. I, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2021.1893509. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07357907.2021.1893509. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY (OSTP).Federal Research Misconduct Policy. In: FEDERAL REGISTER. Rockville: Office of Research Integrity, 2000. p. 76260-76264. v. 65, n. 235. Disponível em: https://ori.hhs.gov/federal-research-misconduct-policy. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2022.
OLIVEIRA, Marcus; BOZZA, Patrícia; BRANDÃO, Adeilton. Como superar a ciência impaciente e a quantofrenia acadêmica?. Rio de Janeiro: Centro de Estudos Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2021. 1 vídeo (132 min). Publicado pelo Canal IOC. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MF26rJs1wN4. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2022.
ORANSKY, Ivan. List of retracted covid-19 papers grows past 70. In: ABRITIS, Alison; KINCAID, Ellie. Retraction Watch, [s. l.], 30 dez. 2020. Disponível em: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/12/30/list-of-retracted-covid-19-papers-grows-past-70/. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
ORANSKY, Ivan. Research integrity in the covid-19 era: insights from Retraction Watch co-founder Ivan Oransky. The Publication Plan, Oxford, 17 mar. 2021. Disponível em: https://thepublicationplan.com/2021/03/17/research-integrity-in-the-covid-19-era-insights-from-retraction-watch-co-founder-ivan-oransky. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2022.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Why open science is critical to combatting covid-19. OECDHomepage, [Paris], 12 maio 2020. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavírus (covid-19). Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/why-open-science-is-critical-to-combatting-covid-19-cd6ab2f9/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
PETERSON, Christopher J.; ALEXANDER, Robert; NUGENT, Kenneth. Covid-19 article retractions in journals indexed in PubMed. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Filadélfia, v. 364, n. 1, p. 127-128, 02 fev. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.amjms.2022.01.014. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296292200060X?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
PILLER, Charles. Disgraced covid-19 studies are still routinely cited. Science, Londres, v. 371, n. 6527, p. 331-332, 22 jan. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.371.6527.331. Disponível em: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.371.6527.331. Acesso em: 22 jun. 2022.
REGO, Sérgio Tavares de Almeida et al. Guia de Integridade em Pesquisa da Fiocruz. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2019. Disponível em: https://portal.fiocruz.br/documento/guia-de-integridade-em-pesquisa. Acesso em: 03 abr. 2022.
RESNIK, David B.; SHAMOO, Adil E. The Singapore Statement on research integrity. Accountability in Research, Londres, v. 18, n. 2, p. 71-75, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.557296. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989621.2011.557296. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2022.
RETRACTION WATCH. Retracted coronavirus (covid-19) papers. In: ABRITIS, Alison; KINCAID, Ellie. Retraction Watch, [s. l.], 2022. Disponível em: https://retractionwatch.com/retracted-coronavirus-covid-19-papers/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022. SADLER, Kristen. The covid-19 outbreak highlights the potential of preprints. Times Higher Education, [s. l.], 02 mar. 2020. Opinion. Disponível em: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/covid-19-outbreak-highlights-potential-preprints. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
SANTOS, Paula Xavier (coord.). Livro verde –ciência aberta e dados abertos: mapeamento e análise de políticas, infraestruturas e estratégias em perspectiva nacional e internacional. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2017. Disponível em:https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/24117. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
SHOIB, Sheikh et al. Publish or perish: panic publishing a danger to science during covid-19. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Londres, v. 55, n. 7, p. 733, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00048674211009624. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00048674211009624. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
SILVA, Rondineli Mendes da et al. Perfil e financiamento da pesquisa em saúde desencadeada pela pandemia da covid-19 no Brasil. Vigilância Sanitária em Debate, Rio de Janeiro, v. 8, n. 2, p. 28-38, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.01579. Disponível em: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1579. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
STATEMENT of retraction: Vitritis and outer retinal abnormalities in a patient with covid-19. Ocular immunology and inflammation, Londres, v. 29, n. 5, p. 1035, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2021.1978772. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09273948.2021.1978772. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
THE DECLARATION ON RESEARCH ASSESSMENT (DORA). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. São Francisco: DORA, 2012. Disponível em: https://sfdora.org/read/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.THE LANCET. Covid-19 content collection. Londres: Elsevier: 2022. (Covid-19 Resource Centre). Disponível em: https://www.thelancet.com/coronavirus/collection. Acesso em: 26 mar 2022.
THE LANCET. Department of Error.The Lancet, Londres, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31249-6. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673620312496. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
THE LANCET EDITORS. Expression of concern: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of covid-19: a multinational registry analysis. The Lancet, Londres, v. 395, n. 10240, p. e102, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31290-3. Disponível em: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31290-3/fulltext. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (NEJM). Coronavirus (covid-19).Waltham: Massachusetts Medical Society, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.nejm.org/coronavirus. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2022.
UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais da Universidade de São Paulo. Indicadores de Pesquisa. São Paulo: ABCD, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.abcd.usp.br/apoio-pesquisador/indicadores-pesquisa/lista-indicadores-bibliometricos/. Acesso em: 01 set. 2022.
VASCONCELOS, Sonia M. R. et al. An ongoing science-society-ethics experiment: the human challenge trial debate in covid-19 pandemic. European Molecular Biology Organization Reports,Londres, v. 23, n. 1, p. e54184, jan. 2022a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202154184. Disponível em: https://www.embopress.org/doi/epdf/10.15252/embr.202154184. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
VASCONCELOS, Sonia M. R. et al. Brazilian science and research integrity: Where are we? What next?. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro, v. 87, n. 2, p. 1259-1269, 2015. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520150165. Disponível em: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652015000201259&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2022.
VASCONCELOS, Sonia M. R. et al. Ética em pesquisa em seres humanos covid-19.Rio de Janeiro: LECCS, 2021a. 1 vídeo (13:58 min), Publicado pelo canal SciELO. Disponível em: https://youtu.be/Gsf222FhJMQ. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2022.
VASCONCELOS, Sonia M. R. Integridade e conduta responsável na pesquisa: grandes desafios. Revista Pesquisa Fapesp, São Paulo, n. 200, p. 58-59, 2012. Entrevista. Disponível em: https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/integridade-e-conduta-responsavel-na-pesquisa-grandes-desafios/. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2022.
VASCONCELOS, Sonia M. R. et al. Perceptions of plagiarism among PhDs across the sciences, engineering, humanities, and arts: Results from a national survey in Brazil. Accountability in Research, Londres, p. 1-32, jan. 2022b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.2018306. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08989621.2021.2018306?journalCode=gacr20. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
VASCONCELOS, Sonia M. R. et al. Uma perspectiva sobre aspectos éticos e regulatórios sobre a pesquisa em seres humanos na pandemia de covid-19. SciELO em Perspectiva. São Paulo, 29 abr. 2021b. Disponível em:https://blog.scielo.org/blog/2021/04/29/uma-perspectiva-sobre-aspectos-eticos-e-regulatorios-sobre-a-pesquisa-em-seres-humanos-na-pandemia-de-covid-19/#.YuekWXbMLrc. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2022.
VENANCIO, Jorge Alves de Almeida. Informe à sociedade. Brasília, DF: CONEP, 2020. Disponível em:http://conselho.saude.gov.br/images/comissoes/conep/documentos/CARTAS/Informe_Conep_sobre_2019-nCoV.pdf. Acesso em: 02 abr. 2022.
WHITE, Karen. Publications output: U.S. trends and international comparisons. Alexandria (VA): National Science Foundation, 2019. (Science & Engineering Indicators 2020). Disponível em:https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20206/. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2022.
WILSDON, James et al. The metric tide:report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. [Bristol]: HEFCE, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363. Disponível em: https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/RE-151221-TheMetricTideFullReport2015.pdf. Acesso em: 03 abr. 2022.
WORLD CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH INTEGRITY (WCRI), 4., 2015, Rio de Janeiro. Site do Evento. [S.l.]: World Conferences on Research Integrity, 2015. Disponível em:https://wcrif.org/wcri2015. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2022.
WORLDOMETER. Making world statistics available in a thought-provoking and time relevant format to a wide audience around the world. Worldometer,[S. l.], 2022. Disponível em: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/. Acesso em: 12 mar. 2022.
ZIKA response must not drain research funds. Nature, Londres, v. 537, n. 7618, p. 7, 2016. Editorial. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/537007a. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/537007a. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Carmen Penido, Cíntia Lanzarini, Mariana Dias Ribeiro, Ângela Esher, Mariana Conceição Souza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author’s rights: The author retains unrestricted rights over his work.
Rights to reuse: Reciis adopts the Creative Commons License, CC BY-NC non-commercial attribution according to the Policy on Open Access to Knowledge by Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. With this license, access, download, copy, print, share, reuse, and distribution of articles is allowed, provided that it is for non-commercial use and with source citation, granting proper authorship credits and reference to Reciis. In such cases, no permission is required from the authors or editors.
Rights of authors’s deposit / self-archiving: The authors are encouraged to deposit the published version, along with the link of their article in Reciis, in institutional repositories.
