Normative aspects of the science evaluation: thoughts for the research in History of the Sciences and Health of the House of Oswaldo Cruz
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v11i0.1403Keywords:
Health Sciences, Technology and Innovation Management, Resources for Research, Science Evaluation, History of the Sciences and Health.Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the normative aspects related to the science evaluation, which is situated the research in History of the Sciences and Health of the House of Oswaldo Cruz (COC) / Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz). Brings reflections on the main models of science evaluation, the peer review and quantitative indicators, and indicates the incorporation of new models, open science and altmetric indicators. Turns out that all models are criticized and there is no consensus on a standard. Describes the evaluation criteria adopted by Fiocruz, COC and the area of History of Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes). Highlights the creation of the Fiocruz`s Observatory on Science, Technology and Innovation and the Open Access Policy as efforts to overcome the limits of traditional models of science evaluation and the area of History of Capes changed the evaluation criteria for periodicals, beginning to use the insertion in databases and bibliometric indicators in the classification.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Author’s rights: The author retains unrestricted rights over his work.
Rights to reuse: Reciis adopts the Creative Commons License, CC BY-NC non-commercial attribution according to the Policy on Open Access to Knowledge by Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. With this license, access, download, copy, print, share, reuse, and distribution of articles is allowed, provided that it is for non-commercial use and with source citation, granting proper authorship credits and reference to Reciis. In such cases, no permission is required from the authors or editors.
Rights of authors’s deposit / self-archiving: The authors are encouraged to deposit the published version, along with the link of their article in Reciis, in institutional repositories.