Perspectivas multimodales de la comunicación con mascarillas faciales en tiempos de covid-19

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v18i3.4314

Palabras clave:

Habla-en-interacción, Mascarillas faciales, Covid-19, Intercorporalidad, Intersinestesia

Resumen

Estudios recientes sobre el habla en interacción destacan la naturaleza encarnada de la interacción. La pandemia de covid-19 ha cambiado nuestra comunicación con restricciones interactivas relacionadas con nuestra movilidad limitada, el distanciamiento social y el uso de mascarillas, por eso preguntamonos: qué ocurre cuando el uso de máscaras bloquea partes importantes de fluidez interaccional y cómo enfrentan a ello los interlocutores implicados. Hemos recopilado datos de vídeo, y mediante la recopilación, transcripción y análisis de datos de lo princípio de la pandemia, tuvimos los resultados: (a) el levantamiento de cejas pasa a primer plano como marcador de acento de tono; (b) el espacio gestual se amplía y es utilizado de forma marcada por más gestos de ritmo, cuando hay distanciamiento social y uso de mascarillas; y (c) la pérdida de expresión facial por el uso de mascarillas faciales se compensa con señales de entonación y con la ruptura del distanciamiento.

Biografía del autor/a

Ulrike Agathe Schröder, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Letras. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Doutorado em Comunicação pela Universidade de Duisburg-Essen.

Anna Ladilova, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen. Gießen, Alemanha.

Doutorado em Sociolinguística pela Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen.

Sineide Gonçalves, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Letras. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Doutorado em Estudos Linguísticos pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

Fernanda Roque Amendoeira, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Letras. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Mestrado em Estudos Linguísticos pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

Citas

ALLWOOD, Jens. Bodily communication dimensions of expression and content. In: GRANSTRÖM, Björn; HOUSE, David; KARLSSON, Inger. (ed.). Multimodality in language and speech systems. Dordrecht: Springer, 2002. p. 7-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2367-1_2. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-2367-1_2. Acesso em: 2 set. 2024.

BAVELAS, Janet; GERWING, Jennifer; HEALING, Sara. Including facial gestures in gesture-speech ensembles. In: SEYFEDDINIPUR, Mandana; GULLBERG, Marianne (ed.). From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance. Amsterdam; Filadélfia: John Benjamins, 2014. p. 15-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.02bav. Disponível em: https://benjamins.com/catalog/z.188.02bav. Acesso em: 2 set. 2024.

BRESSEM, Jana; MÜLLER, Cornelia. A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In: MÜLLER, Cornelia et al. (org.). Body – Language – Communication: an international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlim: De Gruyter Mouton, 2014. v. 1. p. 1575-1591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1575. Disponível em: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110302028.1575/html. Acesso em: 2 set. 2024.

CARBON, Claus-Christian. Wearing face masks strongly confuses counterparts in reading emotions. PsyArXiv Preprints, 2020. Preprint. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/x3uh6. Disponível em: https://psyarxiv.com/x3uh6/. Acesso em: 5 out. 2020.

COUPER-KUHLEN, Elizabeth; SELTING, Margret. Interactional linguistics: studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

COUPER-KUHLEN, Elizabeth; SELTING, Margret (ed.). Prosody in conversation. interactional studies. Cambridge; Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862. Disponível em: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/prosody-in-conversation/8AA48A4FB98505F2AD5BB6D501B7B05A. Acesso em: 2 set. 2024.

DE VOS, Jonas. The effect of covid-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, [s. l.], v. 5, maio 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100121. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198220300324?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 5 out. 2020.

EN CUBA: obligatorio usar nasobuco en el transporte público. [S. l.: s. n.], 28 mar. 2020. 1 vídeo (1m56s). Publicado pelo Canal Caribe. Disponível em: https://youtu.be/tU1p3P_vTOU?si=UWmVR0FD1vxuYLGb. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2024.

FLECHA-GARCÍA, María L. Eyebrow raises in dialogue and their relation to discourse structure, utterance function, and pitch accents in English. Speech Communication, [s. l.], v. 52, n. 6, p. 542-554, jun. 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2009.12.003. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639309001782?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 5 out. 2020.

GONÇALVES, Sineide. Interação 2020CLBrPSF1. [S. l.: s. n.], 27 jan. 2022. 1 vídeo (47s). Publicado pelo canal Dra. Sineide Gonçalves. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D18aF9j_hDo. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2024.

GOODWIN, Charles. Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers (Language, thought, and culture). Nova Iorque: Academic Press, 1981.

GOODWIN, Charles. Gesture as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, [s. l.], v. 62, n. 1-2, p. 29-49, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29. Disponível em: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29. Acesso em: 12 set. 2024.

HALL, Edward T. A system for the notation of proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist, [s. l.], v. 65, n. 5, p. 1003-1026, out. 1963. Disponível em: https://e-edu.nbu.bg/pluginfile.php/1261108/mod_resource/content/1/Edward%20Hall%20-%20A%20System%20for%20the%20Notation%20of%20Proxemic%20Behavior%201963.pdf. Acesso em: 5 out. 2020.

KATILA, Julia; GAN, Yumei; GOODWIN, Marjorie H. Interaction rituals and ‘social distancing’: New haptic trajectories and touching from a distance in the time of Covid-19. Discourse Studies, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 4, p. 418-440, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620928213. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445620928213. Acesso em: 5 out. 2020.

KENDON, Adam. Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

KENDON, Adam. Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

MCNEILL, David. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

MCNEILL, David. Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

MCNEILL, David. Why we gesture: the surprising role of hand movements in communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/CBO9781316480526. Disponível em: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/why-we-gesture/5A54FFD659C12DEBDB7A4718ECB7687C. Acesso em: 2 set. 2024.

MDR. Interview mit einem Friseur. [S. l.: s. n.], 2020. 1 vídeo. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNtv_dcnG88. Acesso em: 5 set. 2020.

MENDEL, Lisa Lucks; GARDINO, Julie A.; ATCHERSON, Samuel R. Speech understanding using surgical masks: a problem in health care? Journal of American Academy of Audiology, Burlington, v. 19, n. 9, p. 686-695, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.19.9.4. Disponível em: https://www.memphis.edu/spal/pdfs/2008mendel_et_al_speech_understanding.pdf. Acesso em: 5 out. 2020.

MEYER, Christian; STREECK, Jürgen; JORDAN, J. Scott. Introduction. In: MEYER, Christian; STREECK, Jürgen; JORDAN, J. Scott. (ed.). Incorporeality: emerging socialities in interaction. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2017.

SCHRÖDER, Ulrike et al. Um sistema para transcrever a fala-em-interação: GAT 2. Veredas – Revista de Estudos Linguísticos, Juiz de Fora, v. 20, n. 2, p. 6-61, 2016. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/veredas/article/view/28203. Acesso em: 2 set. 2024.

SELTING, Margret. Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of lists construction as an interactional resource. InLiSt: Interaction and Linguistic Structures, [s. l.], n. 35, p. 1-65, 2003. Disponível em: https://d-nb.info/1079796010/34. Acesso em: 5 out. 2020.

SELTING, Margret et al. A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion, [s. l.], n. 12, v. p. 1-51, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2011/px-gat2-englisch.pdf. Acesso em: 2 set. 2024.

STIVERS, Tanya. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, [s. l.], v. 41, n. 1, p. 31-57, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351810701691123. Acesso em: 5 out. 2020.

Publicado

2024-09-30

Cómo citar

Schröder, U. A., Ladilova, A., Gonçalves, S., & Amendoeira, F. R. (2024). Perspectivas multimodales de la comunicación con mascarillas faciales en tiempos de covid-19. RECIIS, 18(3), 488–504. https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v18i3.4314

Número

Sección

Dossier Cuidado-en-interacción: prácticas, conocimientos y reflexividad en salud

Artículos similares

1 2 3 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.